It hardly matters from which unverified perspective you chose to look at the world though does it? Be it naturalistic or theistic, a perspective without verification is just as erroneous as any other.
You say that having beliefs has value, but only if you value comfort over truth, for those who value having true beliefs the methodology is paramount regardless of the subjective value that can be squeezed out, thus even if the truth was to be horrific those who value having true beliefs would reject an ignorant bliss. Also, the ability to "see differently" has no bearing on whether or not you are "seeing correctly" which again ties into the comfort vs justification debate.
The heart is nothing but a pump, so I sure hope your head has control
So for what reasons did you reject theism? You found it to be epistemologically unjustified?
You say that having beliefs has value, but only if you value comfort over truth, for those who value having true beliefs the methodology is paramount regardless of the subjective value that can be squeezed out, thus even if the truth was to be horrific those who value having true beliefs would reject an ignorant bliss. Also, the ability to "see differently" has no bearing on whether or not you are "seeing correctly" which again ties into the comfort vs justification debate.
The heart is nothing but a pump, so I sure hope your head has control
So for what reasons did you reject theism? You found it to be epistemologically unjustified?
.
