(October 28, 2015 at 3:50 am)robvalue Wrote: Indeed. All these Kalam style stupid arguments follow the same pattern:
1) My simplistic attempts to understand our reality produce a rule R.
2) There appears to be a paradox P in relation to rule R being a full and consistent explanation.
3) Since rule R must be correct, there can't actually be a paradox. So there must be some exception E to rule R which solves the apparent paradox P.
4) ???
5) E is a sentient being, also a god, also the God of my religion, also my specific interpretation of the God of my religion, and I have a personal relationship with it.
![[Image: 20100311.gif]](https://images.weserv.nl/?url=smbc-comics.com%2Fcomics%2F20100311.gif)
How will we know, when the morning comes, we are still human? - 2D
Don't worry, my friend. If this be the end, then so shall it be.
Don't worry, my friend. If this be the end, then so shall it be.