Actual Infinities

[Neo-Scholastic]

I made some solid arguments. Chadwooters did not respond to any of them except to tell me to look up nominism. So basically he said that what he was arguing was valid because it had a branch of philosophy named specifically for it. He did not argue his case.

I will try to say this as respectfully as I can. The debate over the ontological status of principles, universals, categories and concepts (just for a start) has rich history and some of the most brilliant minds have put much thought into the issues. Your arguments correlated largely with a school of thought called Nominalism. As a courtesy, I gave you that reference so you could maybe better understand the strengths and weaknesses of your beliefs, refine your understanding, and present a coherent argument.