RE: Sentience
December 19, 2010 at 5:48 am
(This post was last modified: December 19, 2010 at 5:50 am by theVOID.)
1. Is flawed. By it's self it's a black swan fallacy, your support has more problems.
Firstly, what is your proof for complexity being necessarily caused? What is your proof that something that is complex was necessarily simple at an earlier time? If complexity is posited at t0 (which God is) then it cannot possibly have an antecedent simplicity, Thus far these points remain bare assertions.
Also, just because Sentience does not exist in all creatures does not necessitate that it is caused. You would also have to establish this.
Um, just specifically what in Chaos theory includes the existence of uncaused sentience?
Firstly, what is your proof for complexity being necessarily caused? What is your proof that something that is complex was necessarily simple at an earlier time? If complexity is posited at t0 (which God is) then it cannot possibly have an antecedent simplicity, Thus far these points remain bare assertions.
Also, just because Sentience does not exist in all creatures does not necessitate that it is caused. You would also have to establish this.
(December 19, 2010 at 5:41 am)Zen Badger Wrote: Chaos theory shoots premise one dead at the beginning.
Um, just specifically what in Chaos theory includes the existence of uncaused sentience?
.
