RE: The Extremis of Rationality
November 8, 2015 at 3:21 pm
(This post was last modified: November 8, 2015 at 3:23 pm by Alex K.)
You lost me here
- you assume the nonexistence of time, yet you seem to simply keep using the concept as if a timeline were still there in the background.
There are also some other things I don't exactly agree with - you might have a false dichotomy here, with time being eternal or not; You assume that time is this continuous line which either runs on or ends. The nature of time could change completely around the edges in the past, for example.
(November 8, 2015 at 2:58 pm)Nestor Wrote: Furthermore, if time did not - at one time - exist,
- you assume the nonexistence of time, yet you seem to simply keep using the concept as if a timeline were still there in the background.
There are also some other things I don't exactly agree with - you might have a false dichotomy here, with time being eternal or not; You assume that time is this continuous line which either runs on or ends. The nature of time could change completely around the edges in the past, for example.
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition
