(November 10, 2015 at 6:29 pm)Thumpalumpacus Wrote: If you're not discussing the "standards of evidence", why is the phrase "extraordinary evidence" in your thread title?
If I could clarify what I meant. It's not about what the standard of reasonable evidence is, but how it is handled. I think it is unreasonable to be expected to hit an ever moving an illdefined target. I don't think that reason and logic are subjective, nor that they only apply to common occurances. I'm open to discussing where the bar is set, but I think it should be able to be applied to all arguments, not just some.