(December 22, 2010 at 7:57 pm)The Omnissiunt One Wrote: Basically, your argument is better as an inductive one rather than a deductive one, CS. As an inductive one, I think it's quite strong. J.L. Mackie says something similar in his epic (in both ways... actually, it's not that big, but still...) book 'The Miracle of Theism'. He says that a being who acts immaterially is so far from our experience as to be a priori improbable.Yes I agree. However, thats too easy ain't it there must be a a myriad of such probablistic arguments. I more interested in exploring gods non-existence (I'll not give up on hard atheism)
"I still say a church steeple with a lightning rod on top shows a lack of confidence"...Doug McLeod.
