RE: TruthisGod vs. LemonVariable72
November 18, 2015 at 1:21 am
(This post was last modified: November 18, 2015 at 2:29 am by robvalue.)
"I think we all know what God is" is the definition of God. That is the problem. It's why I'm ignostic.
I would say there is no initial opening statement for the atheist position, since it's entirely a response to theistic claims. So sure, you could define what it means in your opening statement. It would then make sense for the atheist's opening statement to be a reply to that statement. Otherwise the atheist is just guessing at whatever you might mean by "God".
This is all just my opinion, of course. I in no way mean to dictate how the debate will go.
PS: Also, the atheist wouldn't necessity even be arguing that "there is no God", only that any case for God that has been put forward is not supported.
I would say there is no initial opening statement for the atheist position, since it's entirely a response to theistic claims. So sure, you could define what it means in your opening statement. It would then make sense for the atheist's opening statement to be a reply to that statement. Otherwise the atheist is just guessing at whatever you might mean by "God".
This is all just my opinion, of course. I in no way mean to dictate how the debate will go.
PS: Also, the atheist wouldn't necessity even be arguing that "there is no God", only that any case for God that has been put forward is not supported.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum