Not all that "without god you can have no knowledge" bullshit, nooo!
Or the cosmological argument, or the fine tuning argument...
We've heard all this hundreds of times before. Logical arguments are no substitute for evidence and are only as true as their initial assumptions. If those assumptions are a gross oversimplification of reality, or worse just plain wrong, the conclusions are worthless. Especially if those arguments contain fallacies.
Let's hope he has something new and some actual evidence!
Or the cosmological argument, or the fine tuning argument...
We've heard all this hundreds of times before. Logical arguments are no substitute for evidence and are only as true as their initial assumptions. If those assumptions are a gross oversimplification of reality, or worse just plain wrong, the conclusions are worthless. Especially if those arguments contain fallacies.
Let's hope he has something new and some actual evidence!
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum