The OP's puzzle would not have bothered the Schoolmen. They made the distinction between what someone can imagine versus what one can conceive. For example, people cannot imagine a set of 3,543,672 objects; however, people can conceive such a set. Likewise, no one can imagine a truly formless substance or a substance completely devoid of form. And yet it is possible to consider each in concept. I say Man's rationality is not limited by his imagination.
Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: December 2, 2024, 11:23 pm
Thread Rating:
|
The Extremis of Rationality
|
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Possibly Related Threads... | |||||
| Thread | Author | Replies | Views | Last Post | |
|
The burden of proof relating to conciousness, free choice and rationality | marx_2012 | 107 | 37066 |
December 6, 2014 at 12:40 am Last Post: robvalue |
| Does rationality work on an individual basis? | I and I | 5 | 1654 |
November 25, 2013 at 12:48 am Last Post: Owlix |
|
| My own denials of rationality. | Creed of Heresy | 22 | 13380 |
April 5, 2012 at 1:56 pm Last Post: houseofcantor |
|
| Rationally proving rationality | Perhaps | 61 | 20696 |
December 16, 2011 at 3:20 am Last Post: genkaus |
|
Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)
