Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 10, 2025, 8:44 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
On the Reception and Detection of Pseudo-Profound Bullshit
#8
RE: On the Reception and Detection of Pseudo-Profound Bullshit
(December 1, 2015 at 2:56 pm)TheRealJoeFish Wrote: Here's the first of four studies they did for the paper:

Quote:We presented participants with ten statements that have syntactic structure but that consist of a series of randomly selected vague buzzwords.  Participants were asked to indicate the relative profundity of each statement on a scale from 1 (not at all profound) to 5 (very profound).  We argue that high ratings indicate receptivity toward bullshit.  Participants also completed a series of relevant cognitive and demographic questions.

The buzzwords were actually pulled from Deepak Chopra's Twitter feed. (!)  Examples of sentences were "Imagination is inside exponential space time events" and "We are in the midst of a self-aware blossoming of being that will align us with the nexus itself".

That's odd, it takes me little effort at all to dismiss both of those as word salad.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: On the Reception and Detection of Pseudo-Profound Bullshit - by Jackalope - December 1, 2015 at 3:12 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The New Age Bullshit Generator Amarok 18 5497 October 8, 2018 at 12:54 pm
Last Post: LastPoet
  Pseudo-skepticism chimp3 0 1224 July 21, 2016 at 4:43 am
Last Post: chimp3



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)