Our server costs ~$56 per month to run. Please consider donating or becoming a Patron to help keep the site running. Help us gain new members by following us on Twitter and liking our page on Facebook!
Current time: November 25, 2025, 11:11 pm

Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
On the Reception and Detection of Pseudo-Profound Bullshit
#9
RE: On the Reception and Detection of Pseudo-Profound Bullshit
(December 1, 2015 at 3:12 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:
(December 1, 2015 at 2:56 pm)TheRealJoeFish Wrote: Here's the first of four studies they did for the paper:


The buzzwords were actually pulled from Deepak Chopra's Twitter feed. (!)  Examples of sentences were "Imagination is inside exponential space time events" and "We are in the midst of a self-aware blossoming of being that will align us with the nexus itself".

That's odd, it takes me little effort at all to dismiss both of those as word salad.

pssst that means u r smart

On the basic 10-question randomly generated list, the average "profundity" was 2.6 on a 1 to 5 scale. The average profoundness of a participant's rating was negatively correlated with both verbal and quantitative competence and positively negatively correlated with their religiosity (as measured by belief in things like heaven, hell, soul and satan).
How will we know, when the morning comes, we are still human? - 2D

Don't worry, my friend.  If this be the end, then so shall it be.
Reply



Messages In This Thread
RE: On the Reception and Detection of Pseudo-Profound Bullshit - by TheRealJoeFish - December 1, 2015 at 3:17 pm

Possibly Related Threads...
Thread Author Replies Views Last Post
  The New Age Bullshit Generator Amarok 18 5578 October 8, 2018 at 12:54 pm
Last Post: LastPoet
  Pseudo-skepticism chimp3 0 1250 July 21, 2016 at 4:43 am
Last Post: chimp3



Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)