RE: On the Reception and Detection of Pseudo-Profound Bullshit
December 1, 2015 at 3:17 pm
(This post was last modified: December 1, 2015 at 3:19 pm by TheRealJoeFish.)
(December 1, 2015 at 3:12 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(December 1, 2015 at 2:56 pm)TheRealJoeFish Wrote: Here's the first of four studies they did for the paper:
The buzzwords were actually pulled from Deepak Chopra's Twitter feed. (!) Examples of sentences were "Imagination is inside exponential space time events" and "We are in the midst of a self-aware blossoming of being that will align us with the nexus itself".
That's odd, it takes me little effort at all to dismiss both of those as word salad.
pssst that means u r smart
On the basic 10-question randomly generated list, the average "profundity" was 2.6 on a 1 to 5 scale. The average profoundness of a participant's rating was negatively correlated with both verbal and quantitative competence and positively negatively correlated with their religiosity (as measured by belief in things like heaven, hell, soul and satan).
How will we know, when the morning comes, we are still human? - 2D
Don't worry, my friend. If this be the end, then so shall it be.
Don't worry, my friend. If this be the end, then so shall it be.


