I agree with her on the EU because I'm Euro-skeptic, not because I support her party. The EU has many problems, and one of them is that it's basically and oligarchy dictated by the strongest countries (I'm looking mostly but not exclusively at Germany) and also highly limited by a high number of international and regional conventions, contracts and agreements. What works for Germany might not work for Bulgaria, and what works for the UK might not work for Ukraine, etc - The ideas of homogenization of the EU are naive and very far away from reality. Europe might have proximity between peoples because of a common history and geographical location, but it's very far from being enough to justify a federation or a supreme political authority. I think we will progressively assist to a sort of semi-deglobalization process starting in the EU and I hope international organizations lose power and regional power is increased, specially city-wise. I hope that zones that search for independence get it and manage to break free from oppressive forces. Seriously, the reason why hate speech laws are still in motion is because international organizations said so. I also hope states start to worry about workers more and abolish corporate welfare. If that doesn't change, revolutions will happen no matter what.
Whoever fights monsters should see to it that in the process he does not become a monster. And if you gaze long enough into an abyss, the abyss will gaze back into you
