RE: Is not tolerating the intolerant intolerant
January 9, 2011 at 12:06 pm
(This post was last modified: January 9, 2011 at 12:08 pm by Edwardo Piet.)
Yeah I understood that, my point was just that speech actions are actions too, and whilst freedom of speech actions is less restricted than freedom of other actions, and speech is less potentially harmful, it doesn't mean that speech can't do any harm at all or that it should have 100% freedom bar none exceptions.
So I don't know what you mean when you say "I thought we were talking about actions, not speech" speech is relevant too to the matter of tolerating the intolerant or not. Speech actions are actions too, they do things like other actions do they just have a lot less power and can't conflict physical damage (or at least not directly).
So I don't know what you mean when you say "I thought we were talking about actions, not speech" speech is relevant too to the matter of tolerating the intolerant or not. Speech actions are actions too, they do things like other actions do they just have a lot less power and can't conflict physical damage (or at least not directly).
