RE: The Moral Argument for God
December 7, 2015 at 1:11 pm
(This post was last modified: December 7, 2015 at 1:13 pm by athrock.)
(December 7, 2015 at 11:50 am)Irrational Wrote:(December 7, 2015 at 11:25 am)athrock Wrote: So, it might be okay for one group to permit the rape of children?
You keep regurgitating the same objections even when they have repeatedly been addressed and answered. At least answer the responses made to those objections. I personally told you subjective morality does not demand that we all unconditionally and completely agree with each other's moral standards. I have not seen you answer this yet by me or anyone here who has made a similar response.
I'm not sure to respond any more clearly.
You've said that subjective morality doesn't require that we all agree with each other, and this definition of subjective morality is correct.
Okay... but the point of my question was to illustrate that there ARE some moral issues that we humans DO agree on. And if this is the case, then objective moral values DO exist. Thus far, I haven't seen you offer any argument that they don't.
(December 7, 2015 at 11:39 am)IATIA Wrote:(December 7, 2015 at 11:25 am)athrock Wrote: The problem lies with your first premise.Exactly the same as yours.
It seems to me that you haven't actually offered any evidence that objective moral values do not exist or that a supreme being is the source of them.
All you've done is to name a candidate which might BE that supreme being.
Fine. Worship the mile long whatever, then.
