(December 7, 2015 at 9:13 pm)AFTT47 Wrote: Anyone who is even the tiniest bit familiar with the American constitution and system of government knows that his proposal is just shy of utterly impossible. Why propose something that you know is a non-starter?
Surely Islamic doctrine can easily be divided into its political and religious dimensions, and surely the political dimension would be enough to stop Muslim immigration? The political parts of Islamic doctrine (that derived from Mohammed's Meccan period) are on a par with Nazism. Surely the constitution would have scope to stop Muslim immigration on the grounds that their holy book promotes a treasonous/subversive political doctrine?
