(December 17, 2015 at 5:49 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote:(December 17, 2015 at 5:36 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: You both (especially Brian) are acting as though I somehow downplayed or denied rape just because I was surprised to know men can get erections during it. Seriously, that's all it was - I was merely surprised to learn this could happen to men. I never said it isn't rape if he's aroused. I never said inserting objects into people's butts against their will isn't rape.
I must say this is the most bizarre case of strawmanning I've ever seen not coming from a troll lol.
.....I just thought you should know clearly that arousal is not consent.....
LOL, I never said it was. That's why I keep saying you're strawmanning. Did you read the post you are responding to? And all the other posts I have been writing for the past 4 pages?
Quote: I never said it isn't rape if he's aroused.
I even bolded it in blue for you up top, for your convenience.
And there's this too, which was a post I made to YOU specifically, just last night:
(December 17, 2015 at 12:21 am)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I don't think it matters. Rape is rape, arousal or not. All I was saying was that I'm surprised to learn men can get aroused during rape. The strawmen are strong in this thread.
Soooo yeah, this is really bizarre lol. I don't understand why I'm accused of saying it's not rape if there's arousal.
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh
