(December 26, 2015 at 1:23 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:(December 26, 2015 at 1:21 pm)pool Wrote: Wrong wrong. I'm not saying "that" achieved by random events have a design. I'm saying that it resembles a design.
So?
Do you agree that resemblance of a design can be considered as a design(not intelligent design)?
Like would you consider a house that was made by a set of random events which resembles a real house to be a house or would you not consider it a house?