(December 26, 2015 at 1:28 pm)pool Wrote:(December 26, 2015 at 1:23 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote: So?
Do you agree that resemblance of a design can be considered as a design(not intelligent design)?
Like would you consider a house that was made by a set of random events which resembles a real house to be a house or would you not consider it a house?
No. It wouldn't be designed, it would be something that happened that resembled something else. Like seeing a face in the shadows or bridges in weathered rocks it's down to our perception rather than design.
You can fix ignorance, you can't fix stupid.
Tinkety Tonk and down with the Nazis.