Evidence for Christianity

[Ashendant]

How does people being gay hurt society? how does people having sex hurt society anyway

---

Can you prove this or is this just want some pope told us a long time ago? You know people used to say that women were to dumb to consent and that man had more power over woman so the father had to choose who she married to protect her. Do you think a 17 year old can consent? 16? 15? 14? 13? 12? At what point do you draw the imaginary line?

It's all subjective, my line of consent is maturity, while at 14-15 i think it mature enough to have consentual sex, this of course only applies in the industrial world because at this age most of the teenagers, already know the full responsibility sex can bring due to schools, of course there are some people over 30 that i believe aren't mature enough to have sex

I agree that the vast majority have self control. However, it is difficult to see how society would behave if we were told our whole lives that sex is absolutely fine in anyway you want. I imagine society would change a great deal. People probably would be far more free with their sexuality. The truth is if you watch the Disney channel today it is full of risqué material that would not have been permitted back in the golden days. MTV is currently getting sued for allowing children to do inappropriate things on camera, shame on their parents too.

America is too strict about sex, violence in movies is okay, but damm them if a teenager under 18 sees a nipple, thank god this is far more relaxed in europe, not the violence trough that is far more strict

However, I believe that we would still find purely rational reasons to restrict sexuality. Personally I think a reaction against the Church and traditional morals is behind the rise of homosexuality, not logically looking at it. It really is a more dangerous life style. The life expectance of a gay man is FAR lower than that of a straight male.

[Citation Needed]

Even France, a most secular nation, did a secular study and found that homosexuality was damaging to children so in France it is illegal for gays to adopt, for purely secular reasons.

[CITATION NEEDED]

If gays cant adopt I dont think they should be allowed to flaunt their homsexuality because it is more dangerous to society. Personally I would be for a dont ask dont tell for society. I would outright condemn any witch hunting of gay people, and let them do what they do IN PRIVATE. However, I think the State should only support the tried and true form of sexuality and that is within marriage.

Oh and your form sexually is the true form of sexuality?

The State should not go about trying to regulate people's private lives, but I think it should treat fornication (to use an old fashioned word) like it treats ciagrette smoking. The State has not made smoking cigarettes illegal, and it doesnt try to root it out by force, but it restricts cigarette comapanies from advertising and it encourages kids not to smoke.

Because smoking besides damaging themselves also damage others around it, in fact recent studies shows that after 30 minutes of smoking you already cancer chemicals in your body.

In the same way I think the State should encourage sex within marriage only, and it should restrict any other kind of advertising that encourages any other kind of sexuality. But people should be taught to respect all people, whether they do everything according to the State or not. In the same way we shoudl resepct people who choose to smoke, or fat people who continue to eat, even thoguh the government pushes for healthy life style rather than an overweight life style.

Because being gay is unhealthy

Well I feel like homosexuals and free sex people are changing the traditional sexual mores by trying to force us to accept their sexuality as normal and good. Once again I am for a dont ask dont tell kind of approach. If they do deviant sexual things just keep it to themselves. Well long oppressed groups should not abuse their newly gained freedom. The shoudl have respect for those with different sensibilities who find it troubleing to see a man in a bikini with things hanging out everywhere.

Well this lashing out at homosexual is pretty recent, fifty years ago homosexuality was far more acceptable, and the media making deviant sexuality a label that can't expect

I would be for allowing people to be more intimate whether same sex or not, so long as they keep their sexual life private. I would even possibly allow for two men or two women under certain conditions to adopt so long as they kept their private life private, and did not try to act like homosexuality is completely normal and healthy. I believe the empirical data and nature tells us that homosexuality is neither. Once again I think the only kind of sexuality that should be encouraged is sex within marriage, marriage being a life long exclusive union between one man and one woman.

Homosexual animals exist and they raise their childrens just fine, are you saying that humanity as a whole is worst than freaking flamingos?

God is too liberal on what it considers the marriage

"It is between one man and his sister, and her rapist, Kitchen Condiment, a gal who's kidnapped and raped, a few more women, an adulterer and a pack of raped whores, 700 wives, 300 hundred concubines, and the help, and a son who has murdered his brother".
True story from the bible