Intelligent Design

[AAA]

Molecules to man evolution is not fact. It isn't that hard to wrap your brain around, and the ID argument is not the argument that results from people not understanding the theory. If you want to believe in evolution, you have to have a natural way to increase the complexity of a living system over time. Studies show mutations to be harmful and degrade the genetic information. These mutations in our originally good genome are what cause these diseases that you are complaining about. There are cellular mechanisms (indicating design) that prevent mutations, but there is only so much it can do when the people in our society fill ourselves with mutagenic chemicals instead of the nutritious fruits and vegetables we were intended to eat. This suffering from diseases is almost entirely due to poor lifestyle or inherited mutations from ancestors with poor lifestyles. It is not the fault of the design or the designer.

Show us some factual evidence for such a claim, not the factive dumbfuck source from which that bullshit hatched!

HIDEY-HO!

Factual evidence of what? From fruit fly to crop experiments in which they allow many mutations to occur in hopes of leading to better organisms always lead to less functional organisms. Show me some factual evidence that mutation can lead to increased complexity. Evolution is a theory that requires vivid imagination to fill in the holes. It builds on presupposition after presupposition after presupposition. You have to assume the earlier world was very different than the world we know today as far as life goes. For someone who claims to be so dependent on facts, you place a lot of faith in a theory that requires a lot of speculation. When evolutionists get questions that they don't have the answer to they will say something like, well it could have been this, or it could have been that. They may be right, but they definitely stray pretty far from the evidence with their theory.