Intelligent Design

[AAA]

Change is a fact. Natural selection is a fact. Neo-Darwinian evolution is far from fact.  Saying it is a fact does not make it a fact. And biology

You'll never prove that, all you can do is throw shit at those who doubt your design assertions.

If natural selection happened the way you say it did, then it would not have been through the top-down approach by which a human would design anything. Why do you think anyone would take such a backward approach, and take as much time as it would likely take for everything to happen on it's own?  (according to the laws of physics and chemistry), to design and execute it all, and then do such a shitty job at it? Your position makes absolutely no sense whatsoever.

I don't understand what doesn't make sense about designing things from the top down. What does it mean to design something from the bottom up?

 Again it isn't poorly designed. If you can honestly tell me that these aren't impressive mechanisms to do their function, then you will have me convinced that you are delusional:  tRNA molecules with their chemical specificity allowing them to recognize the nucleotide sequence and bring the proper amino acid. Polymerase enzymes that can join monomers together to build structures. Attenuation, allowing the mRNA molecule to fold based on repeating nucleotide sequences, which allows tryptophan to be produced only in cases when the cell needs it. Proteins that add phosphate groups to other proteins (at the proper times) which gives the proteins new chemical properties which allows them to do accomplish other things within the cell. Certain membrane proteins that have sites for molecules from the environment to bind to them, which causes them to alter the cytoplasmic chemistry of the cell which interacts with the genetic code and allows genes to be regulated based on the environmental conditions. Repressible and Inducible pathways that regulate gene expression to maximize cellular efficiency. The descending and ascending loops within the kidneys to minimize water loss. It is all very good. Again I can't PROVE that they were designed, but don't say that is bad.