RE: Intelligent Design
January 9, 2016 at 7:22 pm
(This post was last modified: January 9, 2016 at 7:22 pm by God of Mr. Hanky.)
(January 9, 2016 at 6:40 pm)AAA Wrote:What I do know for sure is what you don't know. You admit to that, but still you make the claim of "design". What can be asserted without evidence may be dismissed without evidence, therefore, I need not prove you are wrong, but why do you maintain your assertion? If you don't know, then you just don't know!(January 9, 2016 at 4:12 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote: Can you prove that a designer is required for interacting parts to work together? I don't think you can, therefore your answer should default to "I don't know". If you are going to be a scientist, it's guaranteed you will not get far in any respectable scientific circles when you can't be that honest regarding what you do and don't know.
Mr. Hanky loves you!