RE: Intelligent Design
January 10, 2016 at 1:15 am
(This post was last modified: January 10, 2016 at 1:16 am by ApeNotKillApe.)
(January 10, 2016 at 1:06 am)AAA Wrote:(January 10, 2016 at 1:00 am)ApeNotKillApe Wrote: The options are either you understand evolution or you don't understand it. It's not about whether you agree with it, it's not a matter of personal opinion.
So you're saying neo-Darwinian evolution is 100% fact? From a scientific standpoint, should we discourage people for questioning scientific ideas? If so, do you think this type of thinking will halt scientific progress?
I do understand it, and I think it is not the full explanation for life.
Evolution isn't an explanation for life at all, it's the mechanism by which life diversifies. The theory of evolution is the human study of said mechanism.
And yes, evolution is 100% fact by virtue of the fact that something cannot be 99% fact, either it's a fact or it isn't, and evolution has been and can be thoroughly demonstrated to be factually accurate. There are gaps in the fields of study that encompass evolution, but the mechanism of evolution itself is an undisputed scientific fact.
I am John Cena's hip-hop album.