(January 9, 2016 at 7:35 pm)AAA Wrote:(January 9, 2016 at 6:56 pm)Irrational Wrote: The appearance of design is best explained by what is observable rather than by what has yet to be shown to exist.
Right, the design is observable. The origin of the design is not, and will never be observable.
We can observe laws and principles in action. Why insert a designer when the appearance of design (which is not the same as admitting design) can be explained without it?