RE: Intelligent Design
January 10, 2016 at 12:01 pm
(This post was last modified: January 10, 2016 at 12:04 pm by God of Mr. Hanky.)
(January 10, 2016 at 2:06 am)robvalue Wrote: Has AAA mentioned yet what difference it makes if life does turn out to be designed by some sort of intelligence? Just interested if there is any point whatsoever behind this obsession with trying to poison one specific piece of science. Why is it always this one, I wonder? Could it be because it makes the bible look stupid as a side effect? Yes, I think it is. But he's using science to disprove science, by assuming all the rest of science is correct while it would also fall into being useless according to all these "objections". Someone has objected to it, at some point! You can always find someone who thinks gravity isn't real or whatever. What, they aren't a real scientist just because they say that?
I have him on ignore, I'm having a hard time believing he is any kind of science student. If he is, he needs to seriously learn from what people are trying to tell him here. Or the only kind of "science" he'll be doing is creationist science. He seems wholly unconcerned with evidence and instead treats science like some kind of popularity contest. I suppose it is possible to study the theory without knowing much about how science actually works.
Have you seen this?
![[Image: Wedge_document_cover.jpg]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c8/Wedge_document_cover.jpg)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wedge_strategy
It's an organized effort to ruin science, just as AAA and Behe are using. There's nothing the least bit misguided about what Behe's employer, the Discovery Institute has been doing - it's an intentional assault on worldwide intellectual culture, and its success in the US is truly frightening!
Mr. Hanky loves you!