(January 10, 2016 at 2:23 am)robvalue Wrote: Hilarious.
No, it seriously does not look designed. It looks exactly like what you'd expect from a natural iterative process. If you understand how such a process works.
Of course it looks to designed to people who have presupposed it is designed. To people who have to believe it is designed due to religious biases.
Even if it did "look designed", what science is this? Lookey likey theory?
It has qualities of design. You oversimplify the issue. It does not look exactly like you'd expect from the natural process. Nobody expected the cell to be so intricate and complex. I don't have to believe in a designer, but I think the appearance of design is obvious. If you disagree with this, then you disagree with Richard Dawkins, which is fine.
