(January 10, 2016 at 2:59 am)Irrational Wrote:(January 9, 2016 at 7:35 pm)AAA Wrote: Right, the design is observable. The origin of the design is not, and will never be observable.
We can observe laws and principles in action. Why insert a designer when the appearance of design (which is not the same as admitting design) can be explained without it?
Why assume designer when we see appearance of design? Because not doing so would be illogical. There is no coherent theory of abiogenesis and a problem stricken theory of evolution. I don't think it can (at least not yet) be explained without it.