(January 10, 2016 at 10:56 am)Mr.wizard Wrote: AAA, why do you continue to try and poke holes in evolution, it doesn't get you any closer to proving a designer. If I where to grant you that evolution is false (which its not) and told you to lay out your case for a designer, what would it be? If your case for design is that " To me things look designed", then why should we even listen to you or take you seriously.
It's not "to me things look designed" only. It looks designed to everyone who studies biology. Even Richard Dawkins. If evolution was false, then you would have to accept that either there is some other unknown mechanism to explain it, or that it may have actually been designed.