(January 10, 2016 at 12:19 pm)Esquilax Wrote:(January 10, 2016 at 1:43 am)AAA Wrote: Natural selection and mutation are fact. Whether they can lead to improved information content in the organism is up for debate.
Okay, listen... I just got back to this thread, there's pages I haven't read yet, but is this seriously a contention you're making based on your understanding of evolutionary theory? Have you unambiguously defined what you think evolution is here yet?
Because I challenge you to find one single mainstream definition of evolution that even used the words "improved information content," let alone asserts that evolution necessitates that.
Are you seriously implying that neo-Darwinian evolution doesn't have to account for improved information content? Do you agree that information is in the cells? unless you think it all got there right at abiogenesis, then you must accept that evolution does necessitate that. By evolution I mean all of life being related by a single common ancestor. I would say molecules to man, but you had a problem with that before.