(January 10, 2016 at 8:06 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote:(January 10, 2016 at 6:13 pm)AAA Wrote: Please give me the evidence that makes you think that the neo-Darwinian evolution account for life's diversity is correct? Don't tell me that I'm ignoring the evidence when you robvalue in particular have not responded to me directly. I responded to one of your "poor design" statements with quite a few examples of what can be interpreted as inexplicable design. You never responded, yet you keep going on implying that you know more about science than me. You have me on ignore because you don't want to argue the evidence. I think you know that I am more knowledgeable about biology than you, so you just slap and run.
You keep insisting that your examples are of "inexplicable design". How the hell do you know that? How can anyone decide what is inexplicable just because they cannot explain it? Moroever, if you cannot explain something, then you have no business declaring it "designed"!
Where's the blueprints?
WERE YOU THERE?
The blueprints are in the genetic code, and when we can't explain the origin of things that have characteristics found in design, then I think we can rationally assume design.
