(January 10, 2016 at 7:45 pm)ignoramus Wrote:(January 10, 2016 at 7:30 pm)AAA Wrote: Fair enough. You can't demonstrate the type of evolution that I disagree with. You guys may be having trouble seeing that natural selection and mutation are not what I am arguing against. I am arguing against their ability to lead to the life we see (from some ancient ancestor). If you can't show it you don't know it may be true, but you can decide the most likely alternative based on the evidence. We will never be able to show the way that life was formed, therefore we will never know.
Therefore skydaddy... A concept infinitely more absurd which you're comfortable with without question.
We like to question.
It's not "I don't understand how it works, therefore some deity must have done it" its" We know how it works, and it works like a designed system, therefore designer". Based on the quality of the design, we can assume that if it was designed, then the designer was pretty smart.
