Evidence for Christianity

[Zen Badger]

Your biggest mistake here is assuming that God, whom Christians believe is the creater of time, space, beginnings, matter, and all else that encompasses life, is nothing more than a guy with the capacity to do magic tricks, if nothing more than to float around above us forever.

Wrong, we assume no such thing. We actually don't believe he exists, that's all.

God was not created for us. Just because you can't prove the existence of God tangibly does not mean he doesn't exist.

True, we can't prove that he doesn't exist. And by your argument I can make the equally valid claim that the Flying Spaghetti Monster exists, since you can't prove he doesn't, you have to accept I'm right.

Atheists base their beliefs solely on the propositions of science. They forget that science is a limited facility; science itself asserts that you cannot prove anything, merely theorize.

Wrong again, look up what a theory actually is.

Your opinions and assumptions are as provable as the ones of those who believe in God, so why do you think your beliefs are somehow superior?

Because we have have evidence to back up our position. You don't.

If nothing more, we should be contained to an equal platform of argument, for the purpose of argument's sake.

No, see above for rules regarding evidence.

Science has no room for Woo woo bullshit, and the existence of God is clearly Woo woo bullshit.

There, fixed your little typo for you

Atheists are content in the idea that just because science hasn't figured out an appropriate explanation for something, it's obviously still out there.

Not seeing a problem with this.

(such as how atheistic theories grounded in science contradict so many laws of its own platform, they're thrown to garbage; somehow they're ok with this, because it only shows that scientists haven't yet found the right answer).

Still don't see the problem.....

Yet, because a Christian cannot provide a person with tangible proof in the existence of God, our beliefs are thrown back in our faces.

Those damnable rules of evidence again, how inconvenient

Just because you cannot see something does not mean it doesn't exist. Tired as that line has become to hear, people still seem to look past the infallible truth it indicates.

So you admit the existence of the FSM(peace unto his noodley appendage)

The idea that we, a product of creation, have any type of right to demand an account or explanation from our Creator is a grossly ignorant and selfish assumption. Did Thomas Edison have to justify himself to a light bulb?

But Edison was a real person, we have pictures and everything.

People need to get over this idea that we even have the CAPACITY to understand or find the answers to everything..

Yet religion makes this claim all the time.