(January 13, 2016 at 7:41 pm)Kitan Wrote:(January 13, 2016 at 7:40 pm)AAA Wrote: I understand science better than you guaranteed. At least biology and chemistry. You don't understand science if you think that people with disagreements among how to interpret scientific evidence are not scientific people. If I disagree with string theory, can I not be a physicist? Disagreements among people who study science is how scientific views are critiqued, revised, and improved. If everyone who disagrees with the current consensus is not a scientist, then Isaac Newton wasn't a scientist. Neither was Galileo, Lyell, Copernicus, Einstein, or even Darwin. YOU don't understand science if you think that you must agree with the scientific consensus to study science.
You are not having a disagreement with science. Rather, you are presenting an argument that has no place in the scientific community.
Why not?