(January 14, 2016 at 3:35 pm)AAA Wrote:(January 14, 2016 at 3:15 pm)Beccs Wrote: You don't need to see it, you need clear evidence of it.
Millions of people claim to have been abducted by aliens.
The point being, why believe ANYTHING on a claim, without evidence?
I guess you don't have to believe anything just on a claim, but I personally don't think it is a good life philosophy to require evidence for everything. If someone you know tells you they got a new TV, would you demand to go to their house before you would believe them? If people have no motive to lie, then we don't need to require them to justify every single claim they have. Still I think that if we go with the alien example, and everyone but you claimed to have been abducted, you would eventually have to concede that there is some phenomenon behind it, even if they didn't have material evidence. The eye witness is definitely weak evidence, but it shouldn't just be dismissed.
There's a major difference in someone claiming to have a new TV, someone claiming to have been abducted by aliens, and someone who wants not just themselves, but everyone else, to believe and live by what they believe, and who want to force those beliefs to be taught as fact in schools.
Playing Cluedo with my mum while I was at Uni:
"You did WHAT? With WHO? WHERE???"