Intelligent Design

[Whateverist]

Yes, argument from analogy. Just as bad as argument from ignorance.

So, when have you eliminated all possible natural explanations? What peer reviewed journal is your paper published?

Why haven't the majority of biologists been swayed by your oh so convincing arguments?

Face it, you already had your conclusion, and you are constantly forcing the evidence to fit.

Do we have to eliminate every possibility except design before we can accept a designer to account for the design?

Try this:  
"Do we have to eliminate every possibility except design before we can accept a designer to account for the way things are constituted?"

The answer then is clearly yes, just as it is for the way you answered it .. but less confusing for having chosen a less prejudiced way to express "the way things are constituted".