RE: Intelligent Design
January 15, 2016 at 1:48 pm
(This post was last modified: January 15, 2016 at 2:00 pm by God of Mr. Hanky.)
(January 15, 2016 at 12:04 pm)AAA Wrote:(January 15, 2016 at 4:01 am)pool the great Wrote: What you're saying is:No, you've got it backwards. It's 1. evidence points to it being designed, 2. If it truly was designed, it is a brilliant design with incredible mechanisms 3. the designer must be smart
* Designer had incredible intelligence that is truly awe inspiring.
* Stuff works like a designed system because other explanations are not good enough.
* Designer is a reasonable conclusion.
Forgive me for asking, but is this not what they mean by Circular Reasoning?
No proof here that a designer had anything to do with life, only that if a designer was involved, it would have been smarter than you. Which is profoundly challenging to ponder...
Show us the evidence, if you have some - your unintelligent assertions aren't getting you anywhere, and they never will!
Now why, for the thousandth time, would a designer waste billions of years on what appears to be nature taking its course over the same span? Stop being such a wuss on answering that question too!
Mr. Hanky loves you!
