(January 15, 2016 at 1:31 pm)downbeatplumb Wrote:(January 15, 2016 at 12:37 pm)AAA Wrote: There is plenty of evidence for ID, but that is not the same as PROVING the identity of the designer. I could sit back and wait for proof on anything, but the fact is you can prove very little scientifically.
Prove to me right now that the sun will still be there tomorrow.
You know what, I keep telling people that there is tons of evidence that I am the greatest lover ever, but for some reason people just wont believe me.
Dicks the lot of em.
The evidence comes from the genetic code, RNA, proteins, and the way the three interact. All are useless without the other. It is statistically impossible for these to all arrange themselves independently of each other, at the same place, at the same time, in a way that allows them to interact with each other. You will all respond with "Oh, well you just have to wait for a naturalistic explanation before you can accept that intelligence played a role." yet we already know that intelligence is capable of producing these types of systems. So why is it illogical to say it was likely designed?
