Intelligent Design

[AAA]

No, you've got it backwards. It's 1. evidence points to it being designed, 2. If it truly was designed, it is a brilliant design with incredible mechanisms 3. the designer must be smart

No proof here that a designer had anything to do with life, only that if a designer was involved, it would have been smarter than you. Which is profoundly challenging to ponder...

Show us the evidence, if you have some - your unintelligent assertions aren't getting you anywhere, and they never will!

Now why, for the thousandth time, would a designer waste billions of years on what appears to be nature taking its course over the same span? Stop being such a wuss on answering that question too!

I have pointed out the structures within the cell that we can only see produced from a designing intelligence. Repressor proteins, neurotransmitters, the need for proteins to produce other proteins. Proteins that move mRNA around in the cell, lysozomes, all the enzymes needed to metabolize nutrients. Helicases to unwind the DNA, telomeres to keep germline DNA from degrading. The outer membrane of the female egg that prevents further sperm from entering it after one fertilizes it to prevent polyploidy, which is detrimental to our function. Epigenetic factors influencing the shape of mRNA in a way that allows the same DNA sequence to produce variations of proteins. You can sit back and say it all evolved, but you would need thousands of mutations in order with the correct sequence of bases. And mutation events are very rare. Why does it seem like the universe is billions of years old? I don't think that is even close to the amount of time you would need to evolve everything we see.