(January 15, 2016 at 2:17 pm)God of Mr. Hanky Wrote:(January 15, 2016 at 2:00 pm)AAA Wrote: The evidence comes from the genetic code, RNA, proteins, and the way the three interact. All are useless without the other. It is statistically impossible for these to all arrange themselves independently of each other, at the same place, at the same time, in a way that allows them to interact with each other. You will all respond with "Oh, well you just have to wait for a naturalistic explanation before you can accept that intelligence played a role." yet we already know that intelligence is capable of producing these types of systems. So why is it illogical to say it was likely designed?
Because it's illogical to draw conclusions just to fill the gaps in your knowledge?
So in other words, we must do whatever we can to explain the design phenomena without appealing to the most obvious and consistent cause?
