Intelligent Design

[AAA]

The evidence comes from the genetic code, RNA, proteins, and the way the three interact. All are useless without the other. It is statistically impossible for these to all arrange themselves independently of each other, at the same place, at the same time, in a way that allows them to interact with each other. You will all respond with "Oh, well you just have to wait for a naturalistic explanation before you can accept that intelligence played a role." yet we already know that intelligence is capable of producing these types of systems. So why is it illogical to say it was likely designed?

I'll tell you why it is illogical.
It is illogical because there is no difference between - assuming it was designed by an intelligent being and assuming it was designed by my penis.
My penis can produce intelligent beings that can formulate and implement intelligent designs. So, I ask you, why is it illogical to assume that my penis, that is capable of achieving such amazing feats is not the designer of this universe?

Joking aside, that is the reason people resort to

We don't know.

. Because it is equally illogical to assume there was an intelligent designer behind everything - or to assume that it was all a result of a natural process.

We. Don't. Know.

We might know today, perhaps tomorrow, but not. right. now.

edit;
if you're going to ask for evidence for my penis. ready you inbox.

Yeah, we don't know the origin of the structures that in every way function like superior versions of designed structures. But we just can't suppose a designer, be that is just ignorance right? We MUST only consider options that are counter intuitive and natural, because we assume the answer can only be in those parameters right?