(January 15, 2016 at 3:29 pm)ohreally Wrote:(January 15, 2016 at 12:37 pm)AAA Wrote: There is plenty of evidence for ID, but that is not the same as PROVING the identity of the designer. I could sit back and wait for proof on anything, but the fact is you can prove very little scientifically.
Prove to me right now that the sun will still be there tomorrow.
So what exactly are you measuring when you measure 'design'? What are the methods to determine if something is designed vs not designed?
It's been said many times already, but it's the specified sequence of nucleotides and amino acids that are irregularly ordered and have a specific order that leads to a functional product. The intricate workings of the cells inner components is also something we look at. And the method to determine if it was designed is the method of historical sciences as outlined by Newton and comparing multiple competing hypothesis. We know that intelligence is capable of explaining these phenomena, but we have never observed these things coming from any other way.