RE: Intelligent Design
January 15, 2016 at 5:43 pm
(This post was last modified: January 15, 2016 at 5:44 pm by ErGingerbreadMandude.)
(January 15, 2016 at 3:15 pm)AAA Wrote:(January 15, 2016 at 2:19 pm)pool the great Wrote: I'll tell you why it is illogical.
It is illogical because there is no difference between - assuming it was designed by an intelligent being and assuming it was designed by my penis.
My penis can produce intelligent beings that can formulate and implement intelligent designs. So, I ask you, why is it illogical to assume that my penis, that is capable of achieving such amazing feats is not the designer of this universe?
Joking aside, that is the reason people resort to
. Because it is equally illogical to assume there was an intelligent designer behind everything - or to assume that it was all a result of a natural process.
We might know today, perhaps tomorrow, but not. right. now.
edit;
if you're going to ask for evidence for my penis. ready you inbox.
Yeah, we don't know the origin of the structures that in every way function like superior versions of designed structures. But we just can't suppose a designer, be that is just ignorance right? We MUST only consider options that are counter intuitive and natural, because we assume the answer can only be in those parameters right?
No, we just can't suppose a designer because there is no evidence that point towards it. Unlike many, I don't have any problem with accepting that we are in fact designed provided I am shown enough evidence to support the matter.
Now, I'm going to be honest with you and say that I believe in ID to a certain extent, for my own reasons, but it doesn't mean that I won't call out on bullshit when I see it. The reasons you presented are simply not enough, find some more evidence and make a case.