(January 15, 2016 at 5:43 pm)pool the great Wrote:(January 15, 2016 at 3:15 pm)AAA Wrote: Yeah, we don't know the origin of the structures that in every way function like superior versions of designed structures. But we just can't suppose a designer, be that is just ignorance right? We MUST only consider options that are counter intuitive and natural, because we assume the answer can only be in those parameters right?
No, we just can't suppose a designer because there is no evidence that point towards it. Unlike many, I don't have any problem with accepting that we are in fact designed provided I am shown enough evidence to support the matter.
Now, I'm going to be honest with you and say that I believe in ID to a certain extent, for my own reasons, but it doesn't mean that I won't call out on bullshit when I see it. The reasons you presented are simply not enough, find some more evidence and make a case.
Ok, well what evidence makes you believe ID to an extent?