(January 15, 2016 at 9:13 am)Delicate Wrote:(January 15, 2016 at 9:07 am)Stimbo Wrote: No, it's not a conclusion at all. I've been saying this throughout the thread. "Designer" is the hypothesis; now come up with ways to test that against the observations. Concluding with the very thing that you presuppose is not following the evidence by any definition.Already done. CSI.
I'm not an ID advocate but it isn't hard to see ID makes hypotheses that can be tested.
Seeing as id is a word formulation created by creatards to try and pass creatardism off as science, no it doesn't. If you don't believe me google "cdesign proponentsists".
Urbs Antiqua Fuit Studiisque Asperrima Belli
Home
Home