(January 17, 2016 at 6:28 pm)abaris Wrote:(January 17, 2016 at 6:21 pm)Rhondazvous Wrote: After the American Revolution Americans may have felt a need to distance themselves, just as a child feels a need to distance himself from his parents by doing things differently. Then when the child becomes an adult, he can face the parent as an equal so there’s no more need to rebel.
That's giving them too much and too little credit. Dialects simply developed in certain regions. Probably over a very long time, way before the revolution. Nothing political about it, just people talking to each other and developing a particular way of speaking. People sound very differently in the deep South than they sound in upstate New York. And even that is simplistic.
Would you say there was a confluence of things including politics? Is it not possible that rebellion against “the king’s English” may have played a role? I’m not saying that was the only reason, and perhaps not the primary reason, but to say that it played no role at all is to ignore the dynamics of the British/American relationship.
The god who allows children to be raped out of respect for the free will choice of the rapist, but punishes gay men for engaging in mutually consensual sex couldn't possibly be responsible for an intelligently designed universe.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.
I may defend your right to free speech, but i won't help you pass out flyers.
Those who can make you believe absurdities, can make you commit atrocities.
--Voltaire
Nietzsche isn't dead. How do I know he lives? He lives in my mind.