(February 3, 2016 at 7:43 pm)Cthulhu Dreaming Wrote:(February 3, 2016 at 7:32 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote: I accept evolution/big bang so I disagree with that part of it. But I do agree that God does not need to come from anything because He is supernatural and is outside of the dimension of time. He had no beginning.
How does an atemporal being square with the notion of causality - which requires a temporal framework? How is this not a case of special pleasing, and why should anyone take it seriously?
I didn't say anyone had to take it seriously. It is what I personally believe, but f you don't believe it, that is 100% fine by me.
As for your first question.... don't use such big words! Lol. I don't even know what you're asking.
![Blush Blush](https://atheistforums.org/images/smilies/blush.gif)
"Of course, everyone will claim they respect someone who tries to speak the truth, but in reality, this is a rare quality. Most respect those who speak truths they agree with, and their respect for the speaking only extends as far as their realm of personal agreement. It is less common, almost to the point of becoming a saintly virtue, that someone truly respects and loves the truth seeker, even when their conclusions differ wildly."
-walsh
-walsh