(February 4, 2016 at 10:34 pm)Catholic_Lady Wrote:(February 4, 2016 at 9:34 pm)SnakeOilWarrior Wrote: (emphasis is mine)
But, this was not your original claim...
(emphasis is mine)
This is the claim I was responding to
By the claim you originally made, yes your arm would be a human being. Unless, you're shifting the goal posts?
If an arm, or a tumor, or the hair we unceremoniously leave on the salon floor aren't examples of human beings, then why is a fetus, a clone or an identical twin any different?
You also never answered (or I missed it) my question about forcing people to have other people hooked up to them as a form of dialysis. Since the right to life trumps all other rights...
If I missed it, please do point it out.
Well that is what I meant. I thought it was implied.
So, which identical twin is human and which isn't? Only one gets "its own set of human DNA" and the other only gets a copy. If a human is ever cloned, will that clone be a human?
If not, why not?
Thief and assassin for hire. Member in good standing of the Rogues Guild.
