I've noticed a trend where some religious people reject any areas of science that make their narrative look foolish, while accepting the rest of it and even co-opting it to try and show why the bits they don't like are wrong.
I fully support that people should question everything, but you really need to learn what it is you're even questioning. In most cases, when people "reject" parts of science, they are actually rejecting a strawman version of it.
I fully support that people should question everything, but you really need to learn what it is you're even questioning. In most cases, when people "reject" parts of science, they are actually rejecting a strawman version of it.
Feel free to send me a private message.
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum
Please visit my website here! It's got lots of information about atheism/theism and support for new atheists.
Index of useful threads and discussions
Index of my best videos
Quickstart guide to the forum