(February 9, 2016 at 7:14 pm)ChadWooters Wrote:(February 9, 2016 at 11:58 am)Alex K Wrote: As soon as you use concepts such as a "mover" in your philosophical argument and then talk about its properties, it doesn't seem to be a hierarchy any more where physics is secondary…Can you give an example of an argument they make that says something about reality without relying on physics?
I find it difficult to reply since I do not know your level of familiarity with the Scholastic nomenclature.
Just assume that I am not familiar with it
The fool hath said in his heart, There is a God. They are corrupt, they have done abominable works, there is none that doeth good.
Psalm 14, KJV revised edition